Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Johnson & Johnson Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Johnson & Johnson Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Mumbai held that no provision in the Income Tax Act mandated inclusion of trademark, acquired prior to 01/04/1998, in the block of assets thus there was no depreciation allowable on the same. Hence, provisions of section 50 has no applicability and transfer of such trademark is treatable as long-term capital gain.

Facts- During the assessment proceedings, it was observed that the assessee sold two trademarks “Coldarin” and “Raricap”. T

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930