Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
The tribunal held that rental income cannot be taxed as business income when the assessee has diverse business objects. It directed reassessment under the correct income head.
The Tribunal held that once the assessee disputes stamp duty valuation, referral to a Valuation Officer is necessary. The matter was remanded for fresh determination.
The court examined whether buy-back of shares below fair market value attracts Section 56(2)(x). It held that buy-back leads to extinguishment of shares, not acquisition of property, making the provision inapplicable.
The case examined whether promotional expenses should be capitalized under the project completion method. The Tribunal held that such expenses, not linked to inventory development, are allowable as revenue expenditure.
The case addressed whether delayed filing of Form 10-IC invalidates a claim under Section 115BAA. The Tribunal held that the delay was procedural and directed allowance of the concessional tax rate.
The issue was whether interest from co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal held that co-operative banks are co-operative societies, making the deduction allowable.
The Tribunal remitted the matter to the AO after finding that the allowance of expenses was based on unverified claims of evidence submission. It directed fresh verification and adjudication.
The assessee explained cash deposits through corresponding withdrawals supported by books and bank records. The Tribunal held that such documented transactions cannot be treated as unexplained income.
The case examined prolonged pendency of an income tax appeal. The court directed the assessee to file a reply within two weeks and allowed disposal even without it if non-compliance continues.
The Tribunal held that weighted deduction under Section 35(2AB) cannot exceed the amount certified by DSIR after the 2016 amendment, leading to disallowance of excess R&D claims.
