Income Tax : The article explains remedies available after adverse tax orders under scrutiny and reassessment. The key takeaway is that choosin...
Income Tax : The Court clarified that mere pendency of information exchange requests under DTAA cannot justify continuing a Look Out Circular. ...
Income Tax : A surge in Section 143(2) notices was triggered by the June 2025 limitation deadline. This explains why cases were picked and how ...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that penalty under Section 271A cannot be levied merely because books were rejected and income was estimated. S...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that an assessment completed before receiving the DVO report under section 50C(2) is invalid. All additions and disa...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : Tribunal observed that the Assessing Officer failed to establish any mismatch in stock, sales, or accounting records before making...
Income Tax : ITAT Hyderabad held that constituent members of a JV or Consortium can claim deduction under Section 80IA(4) when they actually ex...
Income Tax : The Tribunal found that full payment, TDS deduction, and transfer of possession established completion of the transaction for capi...
Income Tax : ITAT Rajkot held that cash deposits made during demonetization were fully supported by audited books of account, cash books, and b...
Income Tax : The Hyderabad ITAT held that purchases cannot be treated as bogus merely because the supplier failed to respond to a notice under ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Chennai held that invocation of revisionary proceedings under section 263 of the Income Tax Act not justified as AO has applied his mind and revision u/s. 263 cannot be possible for mere change of opinion. Accordingly, appeal allowed.
ITAT Panaji held that, in order to verify violation provisions of section 18(1) of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies (Amendment)Act 2014, AO is directed to verify list of all members of society and examine whether associate members exceeds 15% of total membership or not.
Notice issued by a non-jurisdictional AO was invalid rendering the addition under Section 69A void ab initio. It directly impacted the validity of the assessment under Section 69A, leading to the complete annulment of the additions.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chandigarh has reversed a tax addition of Rs. 6.75 lakhs on gifts received by an assessee ruling that the gifts from his sister and father-in-law were valid.
ITAT Chennai held that invocation of revisionary power under section 263 of the Income Tax Act by PCIT justified since AO erroneously accepted the returned income without complete enquiry. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed and revisionary proceedings upheld.
ITAT Hyderabad directed to reconsider claim of concessional tax rate benefit u/s. 115BAA of the Income Tax Act since Form 10-IC filed belatedly but was filed before cut-off date i.e. 30.06.2022 as prescribed by CBDT Circular No. 6/2022. Accordingly, appeal allowed for statistical purpose.
The ITAT has declared an assessment against SoftwareONE India Pvt. Ltd. void, ruling that an assessment framed in the name of a non-existent, merged entity is invalid, citing a Supreme Court precedent.
The ITAT Cochin has dismissed an appeal from a chit fund company, upholding a 90% disallowance of commission expenses due to a lack of supporting documentation and unreasonableness.
ITAT Ahmedabad has reduced disallowance of foreign travel expenses for Archi Exim P. Ltd. to 25%, citing incomplete but partial documentation and adhering to a previous judicial precedent.
ITAT Vishakhapatnam held that dismissal of appeal by CIT(A) merely on account of non-prosecution by the assessee without disposing off on merits is not justifiable. Accordingly, order set aside and matter restored to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication.
