Income Tax : Smt. Ranjana Kumari/Kalta Vs DCIT/ACIT (Central) (ITAT Chandigarh) The appeals involved three assessees belonging to the Kalta Gro...
Income Tax : Understand the statutory time limits for issuing income-tax notices and completing assessments under the Income-tax Act. The guide...
Income Tax : Learn the updated provisions governing rectification, assessments, reassessments, and appeals under the Income-tax Act. This guide...
Income Tax : Learn how different types of income tax assessments are conducted under the Income-tax Act. The FAQs explain assessment procedures...
Income Tax : Section 154 permits rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in assessment orders, intimations, and TDS/TCS processing s...
Income Tax : Delhi ITAT allows Sanco Holding, a Norwegian company, to compute income from bareboat charter of seismic vessels under Article 21(...
Income Tax : It has been observed that in many cases an assessee may wish to make a claim which was not made in the return of income filed unde...
Income Tax : We have attached a file in excel format. The file contains the format of various details which normally assessing officer asks As...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held legal services are not FTS under Section 9(1)(vii) and directed partner-wise DTAA examination. FTS addition was de...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai deleted a Section 69 addition after finding documentary evidence established joint ownership, source of funds, and ear...
Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai quashed reassessment after finding no Section 143(2) notice and that the AO issued a final order disguised as a draft ...
Income Tax : ITAT Surat held that delayed filing of Form 10B is a procedural lapse and remanded the matter after directing the AO to consider t...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that interest and dividend earned from co-operative banks qualify for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). Totgar's ...
Income Tax : Instruction No.1/2015 Clarification regarding applicability of section 143(1D) of the Income-tax Act, 1961- Vide Finance Act, 2012...
ITAT Ahmedabad held that cash deposits cannot be treated as unexplained merely because they were made in old denomination notes during demonetisation. The Tribunal remanded the matter to verify whether the deposits represented genuine business sales.
The ITAT Pune held that compensation received under an Early Retirement Scheme could not be taxed as profits in lieu of salary under Section 17(3)(i). Following earlier judicial precedents, it directed deletion of the addition.
The ITAT held that penalty proceedings under Section 270A were invalid because the Assessing Officer did not specify the applicable statutory charge under the provision. It ruled that such omission violated the principles of natural justice and quashed the penalty.
The Delhi ITAT held that cash deposits sourced from recorded cash sales cannot be treated as unexplained credits once the sales and books of account are accepted. The Tribunal deleted the Section 68 addition as it resulted in double taxation of the same income.
The ITAT Delhi held that only 1% of the gross bank transactions could be assessed as income after finding that the assessee acted as a commission agent. It upheld the CIT(A)’s reliance on the consistent approach adopted in the preceding assessment year.
The ITAT held that sales tax subsidy granted under industrial incentive schemes constituted a capital receipt because its purpose was industrial development rather than business profits. The Revenue’s appeal was dismissed and the subsidy was excluded from taxable income and book profits.
The Gujarat High Court upheld deletion of a Section 68 addition after finding that the lenders identity, creditworthiness and the genuineness of the loan transaction had been established.
The ITAT Mumbai held that where additions were based on seized material from a third-party search, proceedings should have been initiated under Section 153C and not Section 147. The assessment was declared invalid.
The Tribunal held that the entire unaccounted turnover from alleged on-money receipts cannot be treated as taxable income. It ruled that reasonable hidden expenditure must be considered while estimating profits.
The ITAT Ahmedabad held that confirmations and banking documents alone were insufficient to establish genuine unsecured loans. The addition under Section 68 and related interest disallowance were upheld.
