Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : ITAT held spousal gift taxable under Section 68 due to lack of evidence on genuineness, bank trail, and donor capacity despite Sec...
Income Tax : This covers how unexplained credits and investments are taxed under Sections 68 to 69D. The key takeaway is that additions require...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that stamp duty valuation could not be blindly adopted where the property was affected by BBMP demolition proceeding...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that agricultural land situated beyond notified municipal limits is not a capital asset under the Income Tax Act...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that no unexplained investment addition could survive where the booked property deal was cancelled and funds w...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
The ITAT Delhi partially allowed the Revenue’s appeal against Rai Bahadur Narain Singh Sugar Mills Ltd, making a lump-sum addition of ₹5 lakh for unexplained cash deposits during demonetization.
The ITAT Pune has set aside an income tax addition of Rs. 41 Lakh in demonetized notes for Dashrath Kisanrao, remanding the case to the AO for fresh verification of bank deposit certificates.
ITAT Raipur rules in favor of Asha Soni, vacating a Rs. 35 lakh unexplained cash credit. The court found that Section 68 additions cannot be made if no books of accounts are maintained.
The ITAT Visakhapatnam has directed the Income Tax Officer to verify the source of a Rs. 24 lakh cash deposit made during demonetization by Tripuraneni Sarada Devi.
A Comprehensive Analysis of Undisclosed Incomes under Sections 68 to 69D of the Income-tax Act, 1961, Taxation of these Incomes Under Section 115BBE and Penalty Provisions under Sections 271AAC & 271AAD With Insights on Explained vs. Unexplained Income, Judicial Precedents & Finance Act, 2025 Amendments 1. Introduction & Legal Context. The robust and equitable functioning […]
Ahmedabad ITAT directs tax authorities to re-verify V N Exports’ books for demonetization cash deposits, citing prior rulings on cash sales by jewelers. A key verdict on unaccounted income.
ITAT Mumbai confirms Rs. 12 lakh unexplained cash addition for assessee with multiple PANs, citing insufficient evidence for deposit sources.
ITAT Jaipur held that addition under section 68 towards cash deposit in bank as unexplained cannot be sustained since source of cash deposited duly explained. Accordingly, addition of around Rs. 8.60 Crores deleted.
ITAT Ahmedabad deletes Rs. 15 lakh cash deposit addition during demonetization, finding assessee established source through prior bank withdrawals.
Non-compliance due to overseas employment leads to ITAT remanding Rs. 1.9 crore tax matter for fresh adjudication, offering assessee a new hearing opportunity.
