Income Tax : ITAT Mumbai held that an addition under Section 69A cannot be sustained when the assessee is denied the opportunity to cross-exami...
Income Tax : ITAT held that additions based solely on third-party search material without independent evidence or cross-examination are invalid...
Income Tax : A large spousal gift exemption was denied due to failure in proving genuineness, creditworthiness, and source of funds. The ruling...
Income Tax : ITAT held spousal gift taxable under Section 68 due to lack of evidence on genuineness, bank trail, and donor capacity despite Sec...
Income Tax : This covers how unexplained credits and investments are taxed under Sections 68 to 69D. The key takeaway is that additions require...
Income Tax : The ITAT Amritsar held that a valuation report by itself cannot justify addition under Section 69 without evidence of extra paymen...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that stamp duty valuation could not be blindly adopted where the property was affected by BBMP demolition proceeding...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that agricultural land situated beyond notified municipal limits is not a capital asset under the Income Tax Act...
Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad held that no unexplained investment addition could survive where the booked property deal was cancelled and funds w...
Income Tax : ITAT Delhi held that penalty under Section 271AAC cannot survive once the underlying Section 153C assessment is quashed. The Tribu...
ITAT Pune ruled for Yash Construction Co., holding that declared income during survey, if linked to business, cannot be taxed at higher rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Pune rules for Late Harilal Mavjibhai Patel, confirming excess stock found during survey is business income, not subject to higher tax rates under Section 115BBE.
ITAT Jaipur dismisses appeals by Chandalal Verma, confirming income additions for AY 2011-12 and 2017-18, citing Section 292C presumption on seized documents.
The ITAT Pune ruled that additional income declared during a survey at Patel Shoes Co., consisting of excess stock, cash, and furniture expenditure, is business income, not unexplained income under Sections 69/69C, overriding an initial misclassification.
ITAT Lucknow dismisses appeal by Raghav Agarwal (HUF) challenging reassessment and additions following settlement under Vivad se Vishwas Scheme.
ITAT Ahmedabad allows NRI’s appeal, quashing ₹8.31 lakh unexplained income addition for demonetization cash linked to pension & property sale.
ITAT Ahmedabad sets aside CIT(A) order, sending back case of Tosifbhai Tajdin Halani to AO for fresh assessment on unexplained cash, gifts, and expenditure.
ITAT Pune sets aside NFAC order on ₹20.7 lakh cash deposit, remands case for fresh hearing citing non-speaking order and denial of opportunity.
ITAT Rajkot held that the reassessment notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act has been issued without obtaining the approval as prescribed under amended provision of section 151 of the Act is liable to be quashed. Accordingly, appeal of assessee allowed.
ITAT Ahmedabad held that weighted deduction under section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act rightly disallowed as donation is given to Arvindo Institute of Applied Scientific Research Trust who doesn’t have valid registration. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed.
