Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jignesh Harshadbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jignesh Harshadbhai Patel Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Deletes Capital Gains & Alleged On-Money Addition: Agricultural Land Outside Section 2(14), 50C Inapplicable The Ahmedabad ITAT granted major relief to the assessee by holding that agricultural land situated beyond prescribed municipal limits does not constitute a “capital asset” under Section 2(14), and therefore no capital gains tax could be levied on its transfer. The Tribunal deleted addition of ₹44.21 lakh made as long-term capital gain and also quashed separate addition of ₹22.08 lakh made under Section 69A towards allege...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

‘Make Available’ Test Not Met, No TDS on US Software Contractor Payments: ITAT Bangalore Section 54 Exemption Available for Every House Sold: Bengaluru ITAT Books Can’t Be Rejected Solely for Non-Audit; 8% Profit Estimate Quashed Apartment Owners’ Association Not Taxable at Maximum Marginal Rate: ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Allowed Section 80P Deduction on Interest from Scheduled & Co-op Banks View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031