Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
A ‘going concern sale’ on an ‘as is where basis’ does not dissolve the corporate debtor, rather, it forms a part of the liquidation estate wherein the entire business, including assets and liabilities, including all contracts, licences, concessions, agreements, benefits, privileges, rights, or interests, is transferred to the purchaser. Therefore, it was concluded that the sale of a company as a ‘going concern’ means sale of both its assets and liabilities if it is stated on ‘as is where is basis’.
Sharavan Kumar Vishnoi Vs. Upma Jaiswal & Anr (NCLAT Delhi) Whether the Resolution Professional can decide the Eligibility under Section 29A Of the Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (hereinafter referred to as Code) FACTS: The Appeal being Company Appeal (AT) (Ins.) No.371 of 2022 has been filed by the Resolution Professional challenging the order. It […]
Sikander Singh Jamuwal Vs Vinay Talwar (NCLAT Delhi) What is very much clear from the submissions made by the Ld counsel for the parties and the documents available on record that the Resolution Plan fails to consider the payment of provident fund dues as computed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner vide its order dated […]
A person falling under definition of Corporate Debtor as defined under provisions of IBC, 2016, whether incorporated in India or outside India has right to file CIRP Application under provisions of Section 9 of the IBC,2016 in India.
NCLAT Chennai dismisses appeal on Resolution Professional change. Highlights Committee of Creditors’ authority in replacing Resolution Professional during CIRP.
Sumit Bansal, Insolvency Professional Vs Committee of Creditors of JP Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) NCLAT not agreed with the submissions of the Counsel for the Appellant that IBBI has no jurisdiction with regard to question of fee which is entitled to be paid to the IRP/ RP. The IBBI is clothed with Regulations making […]
Supreme Court M/s. Jai Balaji Industries Vs. D.K. Mohanty & Anr. [Civil Appeal No. 5899 of 2021 with 5904 of 2021] The Supreme Court (SC) observed that an operational creditor (OC) cannot use the Code for extraneous considerations or as a substitute for debt enforcement procedures; and the object of the Code is to allow […]
Ashish Chaturvedi Vs Inox Leisure Limited (NCLAT Delhi) With regard to the argument of the Learned Counsel of the Appellants that the Adjudicating Authority has imposed the penalty on the two ex-directors by invoking provisions of the Companies Act, 2013, and thus passed the Impugned Order by travelling beyond their jurisdiction, we are of the […]
Go Airlines (India) Ltd. Vs Sovika Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Heard Shri Krishnendu Datta, learned senior counsel for the Appellant and Shri Ritin Rai, learned senior counsel appearing for the Respondent. This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 23.09.2021 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench by […]
In Re Vinod Tarachand Agrawal Resolution Profession of Mayfair Leisures Limited (NCLAT Delhi) The Ld counsel for the appellant has stated that the exclusion of 90 days from the CIRP of the CD would save the company from ‘Liquidation’. It was also pointed out by the ld. Counsel that there was a ‘Prospective Resolution Applicant’ […]
