Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The NCLAT ruled that provident fund dues are not corporate debtor assets and must be paid in full during CIRP, prioritizing them o...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that foreign oil and gas assets owned through Videocon subsidiaries could not be included in the CIRP of Videocon Indus...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that a joint venture arrangement did not prevent insolvency proceedings where separate agreements clearly imposed suppl...
Company Law : A resolution applicant could not unilaterally alter its financial proposal through a last minute addendum after completion of the ...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that the Corporate Debtor’s email offering payment subject to acceptance of a consequence sheet amounted to acknowled...
Company Law : The Appellate Tribunal upheld findings that the arrangement allowing the Successful Resolution Applicant to receive 50% of PUFE re...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
Ravi Iron Ltd. Vs Jia Lal Kishori Lal (NCLAT Delhi) When the Application under Section 9 of the IBC Code comes with date of default and no other reasons given in the Application or any details for extension of limitation, we see no ground to hold that Application was well within time. The submission of […]
Reduction of Capital’ under Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013 is a ‘Domestic Affair’ of a Company in which, ordinarily, a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a ‘majority decision’ which prevails.
Niew taken by NC:LT in Beacon Trusteeship Limited is not inconsonance with Section 7 read with Section 238 of ‘I&B Code’. Financial Creditor has full right to initiate action under Section 7 for non-payment of dues.
Dheeraj Wadhawan Vs Administrator, Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The Company Appeal is filed by Appellant Dheeraj Wadhawan, erstwhile Promoter/Director of DHFL, against the Order dated 28 April 2020 in the Miscellaneous Application being numbered as MA 518 of 2020 in Company Petition (IB) No. 4258/2019 under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency […]
Kiran Shah Vs Enforcement Directorate (NCLAT Delhi) In so far as anyone aggrieved against any decision or order of the ‘Adjudicating Authority’ of the PMLA, then it is open to him to prefer an Appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, PMLA by resorting to the relevant provision(s) of the ‘Prevention of the Money Laundering Act, 2002’. […]
Association of aggrieved Workmen Association of aggrieved Workmen of of Jet Airways (India) Limited Vs Jet Airways (India) Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) Facts- The only question involved is whether the appellant is entitled for a copy of resolution plan or any part of it. Notably, the resolution plan is already approved by the Adjudicating Authority. Conclusion- Resolution plan […]
In the SICOM Limited vs. Sundaresh Bhat case, the Appellant’s U/s. 60(5) Application was accepted. Learn why Section 42’s limitation doesn’t apply.
Essjay Ericsson Private Limited Vs Frontline (NCR) Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi) When the limitation has extended by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the orders noted above, for a period covering extension of limitation neither application is required nor there is any discretion of Court or Tribunal to consider sufficiency of delay. We are […]
Kanchan Nanubhai Desai Personal Guarantor Vs Finquest Financial Solutions Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (NCLAT, Delhi) There cannot be any dispute with the statutory scheme as contained in Section 97 that when Application is filed by the Resolution Professional under Section 95, the Adjudicating Authority shall direct the Board within seven days of the date of […]
Vinayak K Deshpande Vs Nexo Industries P Ltd (NCLAT Chennai) In view of the fact that the Settlement Agreement has been entered into between the parties and based on the said Agreement, the subject matter is issue is resolved between the parties, as informed by the Learned Counsels appearing for the parties, this ‘Tribunal’, dismisses […]
