Company Law : The article examines the Hamlin Trust ruling, where the NCLAT held that CFO appointments must satisfy Section 203 eligibility requ...
Corporate Law : Explains how recent tribunal decisions shaped the rules for selling corporate debtors as going concerns, highlighting compliance...
Corporate Law : The Tripartite Agreement Trap: When Banks Lose Financial Creditor Status in Real Estate Insolvency This case memo discussed the ru...
Corporate Law : NCLAT holds that time spent in pending Debt Recovery Tribunal proceedings cannot be excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Ac...
Corporate Law : RTI inquiry into NCLT/NCLAT reveals member vacancies, lack of consolidated case data, and opaque appointments, highlighting need f...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : From 2022-23 to 2024-25, appeals filed at NCLAT rose steadily, with IBC cases forming the majority, reflecting active engagement i...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Corporate Law : NCLT & NCLAT eligibility criteria, insolvency rules, and case statistics from 2022-2024. Updates on financial irregularities and r...
Corporate Law : NCLAT held that invoice discounting through the TReDS platform does not convert operational debt into financial debt. The appeal w...
Corporate Law : Madras HC held that a pending NCLAT appeal did not prevent PNB from conducting a Swiss Challenge auction after the OTS proposal wa...
Company Law : The NCLAT held that CFO nominees must satisfy the eligibility requirements under Section 203 of the Companies Act. It set aside th...
Income Tax : NCLAT held that a single application covering multiple years and company officers is maintainable in the absence of any statutory ...
Corporate Law : Tribunal held that proviso to Regulation 7A allows insolvency professionals to continue assignments already underway even after th...
Corporate Law : IBBI orders disciplinary action against Mr. S Vasudevan for alleged violations in the insolvency process of Mega Foods Products Ma...
Corporate Law : IBBI suspends IP for Failure to act during CIRP despite NCLAT directive and for Delay in convening Committee of Creditors (CoC) me...
Corporate Law : Read about the IBBI's disciplinary action against Mr. Venkata Sivakumar, an Interim Resolution Professional, for sharing asset mem...
Corporate Law : Govt issued a circular detailing vacancies for Judicial & Technical Members posts in NCLAT with detailed guide to apply for these...
Fema / RBI : It is clarified that cases admitted with National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)/National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) unde...
The law was well settled that the Resolution Plan which was approved by the CoC could not be allowed to be withdrawn and any clause which contemplate withdrawal of the plan was unenforceable unless section 30(2) of the IBC was breached.
Appellant had submitted that it was a secured financial creditor of the Corporate Debtor. Appellant’s financial debt was secured by charge on certain units and / or charge on total FSI (totaling to about 34,200 sq. ft.) in the project that was being developed by the CD.
NCLAT Delhi held that provisions of section 10A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 would not apply as the date of default occurred much prior to 25.03.2020. Accordingly, held that application filed under section 7 duly accepted.
There was no error in the order of the Adjudicating Authority, accepting the outstanding dues as ‘operational debt’, to be paid as per the provisions of the Resolution Plan.
NCLAT Delhi held that no error has been committed by the Adjudicating Authority in approving the Resolution Plan. Since the gratuity and provident fund of the workers having been admitted in full and paid in full in the Resolution Plan.
NCLAT Delhi held that section 33 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) empowers the CoC to decide to liquidate the Corporate Debtor any time before the confirmation of the resolution plan by the Adjudicating Authority.
Adjudicating Authority rejected the Application. Adjudicating Authority held that Section 7 Application need to be decided, the commencement of the Arbitration Proceeding before or after filing of Section 7 Application is immaterial.
Assessee- TAAI filed the appeal under Section 53B of the Competition Act, 2002, challenging the Competition Commission of India‘s (CCI) order dated 8.05.2020 alleging that the Department of Expenditure, Government of India, the Respondent No. 2, Balmer Lawrie & Co. Ltd.
The CoC resolved not to initiate liquidation process and decided to file an application for dissolution of the CD. In pursuance of the resolution passed by the CoC in its fifth Meeting dated 29.04.2024, an IA was filed by the RP which came to be rejected by the Adjudicating Authority.
Supreme Court while adjudicating matters emphasized the need to follow the legal framework laid down by statutory provisions for the withdrawal of petitions and settlement of claims in a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP).
