Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commercial Tax Department Vs Teena Saraswat Pandey & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : NCLAT
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Commercial Tax Department Vs Teena Saraswat Pandey & Anr. (NCLAT Delhi) Conclusion: Section 37 of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 ( MVAT Act ) and Section 33 of the Madhya Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (“MPVAT Act”) are not pari materia with Section 48 of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 ( GVAT Act ). Therefore, the claim of the Commercial Tax Department could not be considered a ‘secured debt’ merely because of its statutory status as a first charge on property. Held: In the instant case, an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 201...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930