This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Accepting additional evidence and granting relief u/s. 10(26AAA) by CIT(A) without hearing AO not justifiable
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Bhumika Rai (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Bhumika Rai (ITAT Kolkata)
ITAT Kolkata held that CIT(A) accepted additional evidence and allowed the relief u/s. 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act without allowing an opportunity of being heard to AO. Therefore, the order of CIT(A) is in contravention of Rule 46A(3) of the I.T. Rules, 1962. Accordingly, appeal of revenue allowed and matter restored back.
Facts- The assessee is engaged in the business of LPG cylinders under the name and style of M/s Nayuma Indane and DTH services. She is an authorized dealer of Indian Oil Corporation Limited and received commission income...





