Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shyam Sunder Baheti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Shyam Sunder Baheti Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that addition towards unexplained cash credit u/s. 68 unsustainable since AO cannot assume that sales were fictitious sales just because the sales are high in the period of demonetization. Thus, addition deleted since assessee as explained reason for increase in sales.

Facts- The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS for the reasons i.e., abnormal increase in cash deposits during demonetization period as compared to pre-demonetization period. AO after considering the

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
June 2025
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30