Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Corporate Law : The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that judicial officers cannot be intimidated for delivering judgments since every judicial orde...
Corporate Law : The article argues that failure to comply before the AO or CIT(A) can lead to adverse assessments, as higher forums generally cann...
Corporate Law : The Bombay High Court held that merely organising protests or morchas against government decisions cannot justify externment. It r...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court held that an unnatural death in police custody attracts constitutional liability under Article 21, even if ca...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court quashed a Section 143(3) assessment after finding that the assessee was denied a meaningful opportunity of...
Corporate Law : The Supreme Court upheld joint insolvency proceedings against two interconnected real estate companies due to common management an...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Income Tax : The Court quashed criminal proceedings after finding that the petitioner had ceased to be a director before the due date for filin...
Income Tax : Having regard to the gravity of the allegations, the ongoing investigation, the requirement of further probe into digital and fina...
Income Tax : The Orissa High Court ruled that an ITAT appeal cannot be dismissed merely because the authorised representative violated the virt...
Goods and Services Tax : Karnataka HC directed the State to determine and reimburse differential GST arising from GST implementation on works contracts, su...
Goods and Services Tax : Madras HC held tobacco remains unmanufactured where no new product emerges, setting aside higher compensation cess demand and recl...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
The Court confirmed that the Joint Commissioner could not rectify another authority’s order under Section 74, and the petitioner must use statutory appeal mechanisms.
Allahabad HC quashed GST cancellation order and appellate rejection, directing department to issue a fresh show cause notice and grant a personal hearing.
Gujarat High Court upheld the deletion of a Section 271D penalty, ruling that the assessment order did not record satisfaction for initiating proceedings. No substantial question of law was found, and the appeal was dismissed.
High Court held that rewards under GST informer schemes are purely discretionary and cannot be claimed through mandamus. Informers have no right to challenge assessment or appellate orders.
The Court ruled that cotton seed oil cake remains exempt when used as cattle feed, even if sold through traders. Taxability depends on end use, not the supply route.
Court orders full compensation to a passenger injured due to crowd pressure in a general coach, emphasizing systemic failures in boarding and deboarding safety.
The Court addressed the delay in executing a Section 14 SARFAESI order and directed authorities to hand over possession within four weeks. The ruling ensures timely implementation despite administrative transfer issues.
The Court held that a genuine mistake caused by a misprint in a widely used tax publication justified condoning a 509-day delay in filing Form 9A. The rejection orders were quashed and relief granted under Section 119(2)(b).
The Court held that private, non-revenue flights did not meet the definition of non-scheduled passenger services under the Notification. The case reinforces that only remunerated transport qualifies for exemption.
The court allowed re-export of misclassified imported goods after executing a bond and bank guarantee, pending final adjudication of customs duty and penalties.
