Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Income Tax : Read about the Patna High Court's landmark judgment ordering the state government to pay Rs 2 lakh compensation to a victim of cus...
Corporate Law : Discover the significance of joint trials for case and counter case as mandated by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. Explore the deta...
Corporate Law : Madras HC rules specialist doctors refusing to work in govt hospitals infringe upon rights of poor patients. Detailed analysis of ...
Corporate Law : J&K High Court orders compensation for lawyer unjustly detained since 2019 under preventive detention laws. Detailed analysis of t...
Corporate Law : Learn about a landmark Kerala High Court judgment ruling that tax/penalty under Section 242 of the Kerala Municipality Act cannot ...
Goods and Services Tax : HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA: Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank [WPO NO. 547 OF 2019 JUNE 24, 2022 ] Facts: ♦ Petitioner is a holder ...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST, Gurugram (Anti Evasion) Vs Gaurav Dhir (Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Courts, Gurugram) U/s 132(1)) r/w 132(1)(b)(C)(e...
Corporate Law : In order to dispense with the physical signatures on the daily orders (which are not important/final orders and judgments) of the ...
Custom Duty : Delhi High Court admits petition questioning Validity of provisions in Finance Act 2022 which overruled landmark Judgment of Supr...
Income Tax : The Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur in the matter of, Abhay Singla v. Union of India, has recently issued notice in a public interest...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the Kerala High Court directive to GSTN regarding refund claims, errors rectification, and implications for petitioners. D...
Goods and Services Tax : Explore the Kerala High Court's decision in Vadakkot Chackoo Devassy v. State of Kerala, where the assessment order was invalidate...
Income Tax : Delhi High Court held that acceptance of settlement and order passed by the Income Tax Settlement Commission (ITSC) based on full ...
Goods and Services Tax : Penna Cement Industries Ltd. Vs State of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court) - GST recovery proceedings can be initiated on...
Goods and Services Tax : Presence of mens rea is deemed essential for imposition of penalties related to tax evasion. Mere technical errors, without eviden...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court has exempted the Lawyers from wearing Gowns practicing in the High Court with effect from March 2, 2022 till furt...
Corporate Law : Till further orders, all documents/ not summons/Daks through physical mode be dispensed with, except where there, is a specific or...
Income Tax : Hon’ble Judges to hear the matters physically at the Principal Seat at Bombay, on experimental basis with effect from 1st Decemb...
Corporate Law : It is hereby ordered that henceforth, for the purpose of filing of pleadings, petitions, affidavits or other documents in the High...
Tribunal was justified to tax tyre, tube and flaps when sold along with tractor-trolley as a single unit to be taxed separately @ 12.5% [up to 31.03.2011] and 13.5% [after 01.04.2011]
Learn about the recent judgement by the Honble High Court of Punjab & Haryana on Section 43B applicability for Electricity Duty paid by electricity distributors. Read here to find out how the court ruled!
Calcutta High Court held that rendering of advisory service doesn’t amount to Fees for Technical Services/ Fees for Included Services under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-US Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement.
Bombay High Court held that State Government is under an obligation to repay the value of stamps in money in case the stamps are not used and given to Collector for cancellation.
Allahabad High Court held that excessive power consumption, prima facie, establishes the intention to suppress the production and the turnover. Accordingly, the books of account can be rejected on the basis of high consumption of electricity.
Rajasthan High Court held that reassessment resorted only on account of ‘Change of opinion’ of AO and without there being any fresh tangible evidence for reopening the assessment proceedings is liable to be struck down.
Bombay High Court held that re-opening of assessment under section 147 of the Income Tax Act is unjustified as the assessee provided complete disclosure of all the primary material facts during the scrutiny assessment.
HC permitted assessee to rectify its GST Returns filed for the months of September 2017 and March 2018, in order to claim ITC benefit by the recipient, wherein B2C was erroneously mentioned, instead of B2B. Held that, the assessee will be unnecessarily prejudiced if it is not allowed to avail the benefits of ITC.
Gujarat High Court held that order, making the addition of huge amount of tax, interest and penalty, passed in FORM GST DRC-07 without granting opportunity of personal hearing is liable to be set aside.
This writ petition has been filed, challenging the levy of fees under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act, for the financial year 2012-13 on the ground that the provisions of Section 234E of the Act can operate only prospectively, i.e, with effect from 01.06.2015 and not in respect of any earlier period.
