Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court quashed a POCSO FIR after noting that the relationship was consensual and the parties were married with a chi...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Goods and Services Tax : The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside a GST demand order after holding that service through affixation without exhausting ot...
Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order after finding that the show cause notice contained no reasons....
Income Tax : Chhattisgarh High Court held that alleged low production yield and power consumption variations could not justify addition without...
Goods and Services Tax : The Jammu & Kashmir High Court directed restoration of GST registration even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as bar...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court restrained the Income Tax Department from taking coercive steps in reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
The Court set aside the IGST demand on re-imported goods, holding that liability depends on whether input tax credit was availed. It directed the petitioner to furnish a certificate and allowed fresh adjudication.
The ruling requires authorities to hear and decide delay and stay petitions promptly while suspending recovery proceedings. It highlights procedural fairness in tax disputes.
The Court stayed reassessment proceedings after constitutional issues were raised. The key takeaway is interim protection when arguable legal questions exist.
The court set aside a GST demand order citing violation of natural justice as no hearing opportunity was given. However, relief was conditional on full deposit due to delay in approaching the court.
The Court refused to quash criminal proceedings, holding that disputed facts cannot be decided in Section 482 jurisdiction. It allowed the applicant to seek discharge before the trial court.
The case examined whether revision under Section 263 was validly invoked. The High Court held that reliance on the Assessing Officer’s reference without independent application of mind invalidated the revision.
The Court held that issues relating to reliance on a third-party statement are factual matters. It declined to entertain the writ petition and directed the petitioner to avail statutory remedies.
The court held that electricity tariff for determining market value must include all components, including duty. It ruled that excluding such elements artificially reduces eligible deduction.
The Court held that the controversy was identical to a previously decided case. The petition was accordingly disposed of without fresh examination of merits.
The court held that service tax paid on foreign exchange profit was not taxable and should have been refunded. It ruled that limitation cannot justify retention of wrongly collected tax.
