Access significant and up-to-date high court judgments for legal insights and precedent. Stay informed about the latest legal decisions and their impact on various areas of law.
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Income Tax : The article explains how the High Court held that corporate guarantee fees do not qualify as Fees for Technical Services under the...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that refund arising from an unconstitutional GST levy carries a constitutional right to interes...
Corporate Law : The Allahabad High Court observed that criminal case delays are caused not only by judicial officers but also by inadequate infras...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court quashed a POCSO FIR after noting that the relationship was consensual and the parties were married with a chi...
Corporate Law : Supreme Court ruled that CoC and RP can surrender financially burdensome assets voluntarily, clarifying moratorium under section 1...
Income Tax : Gujarat HC has directed CBDT to ensure that there is a mandatory one-month gap between date for furnishing tax audit reports (unde...
Income Tax : Rajasthan High Court granted a one-month extension for filing TARs under Section 44AB for AY 2025-26, citing delayed audit utility...
Income Tax : The Gujarat High Court is hearing a petition from the Chartered Accountants Association regarding persistent glitches on the new I...
Corporate Law : SC clarifies limits of High Court's writ powers in IBC cases and recognises Indian CIRP as foreign main proceeding in cross-border...
Goods and Services Tax : The Punjab and Haryana High Court set aside a GST demand order after holding that service through affixation without exhausting ot...
Goods and Services Tax : The Bombay High Court quashed a GST registration cancellation order after finding that the show cause notice contained no reasons....
Income Tax : Chhattisgarh High Court held that alleged low production yield and power consumption variations could not justify addition without...
Goods and Services Tax : The Jammu & Kashmir High Court directed restoration of GST registration even though the statutory appeal had been dismissed as bar...
Income Tax : The Calcutta High Court restrained the Income Tax Department from taking coercive steps in reassessment proceedings for AY 2015-16...
Income Tax : The Court held that membership cannot be granted where the underlying flats do not exist and are merely refuge areas. It ruled tha...
Corporate Law : Bombay High Court implements "Rules for Video Conferencing 2022" for all courts in Maharashtra, Goa, and union territories, effect...
Income Tax : CBDT raises monetary limits for tax appeals: Rs. 60 lakh for ITAT, Rs. 2 crore for High Court, and Rs. 5 crore for Supreme Court, ...
Corporate Law : The Delhi High Court mandates new video conferencing protocols to enhance transparency and accessibility in court proceedings. Rea...
Income Tax : Income Tax Department Issues Instructions for Assessing Officers after Adverse Observations of Hon. Allahabad High Court in in Civ...
The High Court held that directing unilateral cancellation of a registered agreement was erroneous. Execution must follow lawful procedures under RERA and civil law principles.
The High Court held that challenges to GST assessment orders must be pursued through statutory appeals. Failure to reply to a show cause notice bars writ relief.
The High Court held that writ petitions cannot be entertained against a private finance company. Disputes arising from private loan transactions must be resolved through civil or arbitral remedies.
The High Court restrained coercive GST recovery as the show cause notice spanned six years in one proceeding. The key takeaway is that consolidated SCNs under Section 74 raise serious legal doubts.
The court held that tax liability cannot be increased at the appellate stage on a new ground without giving the assessee an opportunity of hearing. Enhancement without following Section 107(11) was set aside and remanded.
The High Court held that a reassessment notice issued without a manual or digital signature violates Section 282A of the Income-tax Act. Such an unsigned notice is invalid in law, rendering all consequential proceedings unsustainable.
The Court quashed a confirmed GST demand after noting that the taxpayer had not replied on merits to the show cause notice. The case was remanded with directions to deposit 10% of the disputed tax and file a detailed reply.
The Court quashed reversal of input tax credit where claims fell within the extended period under amended Section 16, holding that limitation under the earlier provision could no longer be enforced.
The Court granted interim relief against a large GST demand on minimum balance non-maintenance charges. While adjudication may proceed, enforcement of any final order has been stayed.
The High Court set aside a GST assessment issued after the taxpayer’s death, holding that proceedings cannot be validly conducted against a deceased person. It ruled that fresh assessment must involve the legal representative, with recovery limited to the estate.
