Goods and Services Tax : The article discusses how GST authorities are increasingly reversing ITC based on upstream NGTP allegations without proving fraud ...
Goods and Services Tax : The Gujarat High Court held that supplier tax payment remains mandatory for ITC claims under Section 16(2)(c). However, ITC cann...
Goods and Services Tax : Explains how Section 16(2)(c) links ITC eligibility to supplier tax payment, causing hardship for bona fide taxpayers even when in...
Goods and Services Tax : This article explains how manipulating input tax credit in GSTR-3B without GSTR-2B support is treated as fraud under GST law. It h...
Goods and Services Tax : The article highlights how aggressive GST actions impact genuine businesses. The key takeaway is the need for balanced enforcement...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims based on fake invoices without actual supply of goods or services. The accused was arr...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities arrested the key accused for orchestrating fake ITC claims and fictitious export transactions. The case highlights str...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered fraudulent ITC claims exceeding ₹8 crore without actual supply of goods. The ruling highlights that ITC is...
Goods and Services Tax : CGST Delhi South arrested a director for allegedly availing ₹6.53 crore in fraudulent ITC based on bogus invoices worth ₹36.28...
Goods and Services Tax : Authorities uncovered a web of non-existent entities issuing invoices without supply, causing huge GST revenue loss. The mastermin...
Goods and Services Tax : Punjab and Haryana High Court granted regular bail to an accused linked to alleged fake GST billing and forged documents. The Cour...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court held that summons issued under Section 70 of the GST Act were valid and interference at the investigation stage wou...
Goods and Services Tax : The issue involved alleged cyber fraud where funds were credited to the petitioner’s account. The Court granted relief consideri...
Goods and Services Tax : The SC held that imposing an additional bank guarantee was excessive when a ₹1 crore bond with sureties was already furnished. I...
Goods and Services Tax : Considering the duration of custody and the likely delay in trial, the Court found continued detention unnecessary. It granted bai...
Goods and Services Tax : A Delhi GST alert circular reveals a Rs.6 crore Input Tax Credit fraud by a non-existent entity, detailing the scheme and mandated...
CA, CS, CMA : Delhi GST Dept exposes ₹30 Cr fake ITC via non-existent firms. Circular mandates recovery, ITC reversal & cross-jurisdiction enf...
Goods and Services Tax : CBIC issues guidelines for a second All-India drive to detect and eliminate fake GST registrations, safeguarding government revenu...
Goods and Services Tax : The Ministry of Finance, Government of India, recently released Instruction No. 03/2023-GST, dated 14th June, 2023, outlining stri...
Goods and Services Tax : Government of India has noticed instances of fake GST registrations and issuance of bogus invoices leading to revenue loss. A meet...
On behalf of department, application is opposed submitting that accused have utilized and availed fraudulent ineligible ITC to the tune of Rs 15 crates as such committed a serous economic offence.
In Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta v. Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI [Cr. M. A. No. 1486/2021 dated August 11, 2021], Amit Haresh Kumar Mehta (the Applicant) has filed the current application seeking an Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (the Cr.P.C). The Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI (“the Respondent) has contended […]
The Petitioner was alleged of unjustly availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on fake invoices and E-way bills alongside Mr. Amit Kumar (Co-accused). While seeking bail, the Petitioner contended that he has been in custody for a month, as on date, with effect from July 19, 2021 and therefore, his further custodial detention is absolutely not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case.
In Rakesh Arora v. State of Punjab [CRM-M- 1511 OF 2021 dated January 28, 2021], the current bail application has been filed by Rakesh Arora (“the Petitioner”) having been arrested under Section 132 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“CGST Act”) who is allegedly involved in creating three bogus firms for availing […]
This bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner deserves to be dismissed; for the reasons, firstly, the petitioner failed to appear before the Department while notices were issued to him, secondly, even after filing of complaint before the learned Trial court, he remained absconded for about one year and thirdly, the petitioner is a chartered accountant, who is master mind of the crime and he has created 38 fake firms and availed ITC wrongfully to the tune of 6,36,32,492/-.
The Income Tax Department carried out a search and seizure operation on 25.08.2021 on a group based in Maharashtra and Goa. The group is a prominent steel manufacturer and trader of Pune, Nashik, Ahmednagar and Goa. More than 44 premises were covered in the search operation.
Explore the denial of bail for Amit Kumar in a GST evasion case. Gauhati High Court cites the magnitude of economic offenses and potential tampering of evidence.
DGGI Gurugram Zonal Unit (GZU), Haryana, has earlier busted a case wherein total fake ITC of Rs 176 crore has been fraudulently passed on by Sh. Sanjay Goel, Prop of M/s. Redamancy World, and Sh. Deepak Sharma, the de–facto controller of 8 non-existent firms.
Premprakash laxminarayan bansal Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court) 1. Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 0178/2021 registered with APMC Police Station, Navi Mumbai for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, the applicant seeks pre-arrest bail. 2. The subject crime was registered at the […]
Meerut Zonal Unit of DGGI has unearthed a fake billing racket involving numerous fictitious firms manipulating fake invoices to show the procurement of metal scrap, leading to the passing on of unlawful ITC of approximately Rs. 130 crores without any concomitant supply of goods.
