Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Section 158 makes quoting Director Identification Number (DIN) mandatory in statutory filings. Non-compliance can lead to substant...
Company Law : The MCA has replaced annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a once-in-three-years framework. Most DIN holders who complied in FY 2025-26 ar...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies clarified that Section 155 absolutely prohibits holding more than one DIN. Penalties were imposed even thou...
Company Law : Holding more than one DIN is treated as a continuing default under law. Even genuine mistakes attract penalties, though early corr...
Company Law : The government clarified that shell companies are not defined in company law, but inactive entities are removed through statutory ...
Company Law : Applying for a Director Identification Number (DIN) is a crucial step for individuals aspiring to become directors in Indian compa...
Company Law : DINs eligible to be de-flagged on expiry of the period of disqualification are in the process of verification. Necessary action sh...
Company Law : BJP professional cell, Mumbai has requested FM that The KYC for DIN Of Director should be once in 5 years or linked to be Aadhar e...
Company Law : MCA Removed ‘present Residential Address’ of Directors, KMP and Designated Partners (DPs) Till 18.08.2020, With the he...
Goods and Services Tax : While noting the delay in filing the writ petition, the Court entertained the challenge because the assessment orders lacked a DIN...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a GST assessment order without a DIN number is invalid and non-est. The matter was remande...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court upheld the GST assessment order, ruling that delay in filing the writ and presence of an auto-generated reference n...
Income Tax : The court examined whether assessment orders could survive when DRP directions lacked a DIN. It held that such directions were inv...
Corporate Law : The Court examined whether a sanction lacking a DIN could sustain income-tax proceedings. It held such sanction invalid and set as...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that possession of more than one Director Identification Number constitutes a violation of Section 155 of the Compan...
Company Law : The ROC Kolkata held that possessing more than one Director Identification Number violates Section 155 of the Companies Act, attra...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty under Section 159 after a director was found holding two DINs simultaneously in violation of Section ...
Company Law : The ROC Mumbai penalized an individual for possessing two Director Identification Numbers contrary to Section 155 of the Companies...
Explore mandatory use of Document Identification Number (DIN) in State Tax communications, its legal framework, and Supreme Court’s directive. Learn how it enhances transparency and accountability.
Explore the MCA’s recent decision to reduce penalty for delaying surrender of a second DIN, impacting SPS Motors Private Limited. Analysis, implications, and key details revealed.
Explore the adjudication order imposing penalties on MARS MERCANTILES PRIVATE LIMITED for non-compliance with Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013. Understand the violations, company’s response, and the imposed penalties.
Explore ITAT Delhi ruling in Smt. Sharda Devi Bajaj vs. DCIT. Quashing of assessment order lacking Document Identification Number (DIN/DN). Analysis of CBDT Circular.
The crux of the matter lies in the alleged non-compliance with CBDT Circulars, emphasizing the mandatory nature of DIN in all communications.
Explore the landmark ITAT Delhi ruling in Finesse Intl. Design Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT. CBDT Circular violation deems assessment order invalid. Know more!
The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) order passed without Document Identification Number (DIN) number should be treated as invalid and was contrary to the CBDT Circular No.19/2019 dated 14th August 2019 as it was clear in the body of DRP order, no DIN number was mentioned nor there was any reason of not mentioning the DIN number in order of the DRP.
Rama Pashu Aahar (P) Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi): Assessment Order Deemed Invalid without Document Identification Number (DIN)
Explore the adjudication order imposing penalties on Nestaway for breaching Section 158 of the Companies Act 2013. Detailed analysis, penalties, and deadlines revealed.
Explore the significance of DIN under CBDT Circular 19/2019 in Income Tax communications. Learn exceptions, consequences, and how to authenticate notices.
