Company Law : Registrar of Companies clarified that Section 155 absolutely prohibits holding more than one DIN. Penalties were imposed even thou...
Company Law : Holding more than one DIN is treated as a continuing default under law. Even genuine mistakes attract penalties, though early corr...
Income Tax : The new circular allows flexible DIN referencing instead of strict quoting. However, it does not validate cases with complete abse...
Company Law : The process for obtaining a Director Identification Number involves filing SPICe+ or DIR-3 forms with required documents and digit...
Company Law : The amendment changes KYC filing from annual to a three-year cycle. It clarifies timelines and reduces compliance burden while mai...
Company Law : The government clarified that shell companies are not defined in company law, but inactive entities are removed through statutory ...
Company Law : Applying for a Director Identification Number (DIN) is a crucial step for individuals aspiring to become directors in Indian compa...
Company Law : DINs eligible to be de-flagged on expiry of the period of disqualification are in the process of verification. Necessary action sh...
Company Law : BJP professional cell, Mumbai has requested FM that The KYC for DIN Of Director should be once in 5 years or linked to be Aadhar e...
Company Law : MCA Removed ‘present Residential Address’ of Directors, KMP and Designated Partners (DPs) Till 18.08.2020, With the he...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court upheld the GST assessment order, ruling that delay in filing the writ and presence of an auto-generated reference n...
Income Tax : The court examined whether assessment orders could survive when DRP directions lacked a DIN. It held that such directions were inv...
Corporate Law : The Court examined whether a sanction lacking a DIN could sustain income-tax proceedings. It held such sanction invalid and set as...
Income Tax : The court set aside a rectification order passed without a DIN and beyond the statutory time limit. The ruling underscores that no...
Income Tax : ITAT Chennai ruled that an assessment order issued without a Document Identification Number violates CBDT Circular No. 19/2019 and...
Company Law : The ROC Mumbai penalized an individual for possessing two Director Identification Numbers contrary to Section 155 of the Companies...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed penalty for possessing duplicate Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155. The ruling highli...
Company Law : The case addressed prolonged possession of two DINs due to an inadvertent mistake. The authority imposed a ₹48,958 penalty, hold...
Company Law : This case examines whether an unintentional duplicate DIN attracts penalties under company law. The authority held that liability ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Understand the penalty of Rs. 4,14,500 imposed by MCA for obtaining a second DIN in violation of Companies Act 2013. Learn the implications and legal insights.
MCA penalizes CMB India Nidhi Limited’s directors for not mentioning DIN on financial statements, violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Learn about the Director Identification Number (DIN) and DIR-3 KYC process, including application, documents required, fee payment, and annual updates.
Wind World (India) Limited fined Rs. 1 Lakh by MCA for failing to include DIN in reply. Learn about the adjudication process and implications.
Understand implications of MCA’s penalty for DIN deactivation due to non-filing of DIR-3 KYC. Learn about violation, rules, penalties, and appeals process.
Discover MCA’s penalty for non-mentioning of DIN in financial statements by directors. Learn about the violation, rules, penalties, and appeal process.
Delhi ITAT rules against assessment order and notice of demand without Document Identification Number (DIN), emphasizing adherence to CBDT Circular No.19/2019.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision in Bawa Float Glass Ltd Vs DCIT regarding the absence of DIN in statutory approval under section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
M/s. Octacle Integration Private Limited director failed to comply with Companies Act by not obtaining DIN. Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of ₹3,65,500.
Subhangi Industries Private Limited director appointed without a DIN (Director Identification Number) faces a penalty of ₹3.41 lakh. The company failed to comply with Section 152(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
