Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Section 158 makes quoting Director Identification Number (DIN) mandatory in statutory filings. Non-compliance can lead to substant...
Company Law : The MCA has replaced annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a once-in-three-years framework. Most DIN holders who complied in FY 2025-26 ar...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies clarified that Section 155 absolutely prohibits holding more than one DIN. Penalties were imposed even thou...
Company Law : Holding more than one DIN is treated as a continuing default under law. Even genuine mistakes attract penalties, though early corr...
Company Law : The government clarified that shell companies are not defined in company law, but inactive entities are removed through statutory ...
Company Law : Applying for a Director Identification Number (DIN) is a crucial step for individuals aspiring to become directors in Indian compa...
Company Law : DINs eligible to be de-flagged on expiry of the period of disqualification are in the process of verification. Necessary action sh...
Company Law : BJP professional cell, Mumbai has requested FM that The KYC for DIN Of Director should be once in 5 years or linked to be Aadhar e...
Company Law : MCA Removed ‘present Residential Address’ of Directors, KMP and Designated Partners (DPs) Till 18.08.2020, With the he...
Goods and Services Tax : While noting the delay in filing the writ petition, the Court entertained the challenge because the assessment orders lacked a DIN...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a GST assessment order without a DIN number is invalid and non-est. The matter was remande...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court upheld the GST assessment order, ruling that delay in filing the writ and presence of an auto-generated reference n...
Income Tax : The court examined whether assessment orders could survive when DRP directions lacked a DIN. It held that such directions were inv...
Corporate Law : The Court examined whether a sanction lacking a DIN could sustain income-tax proceedings. It held such sanction invalid and set as...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that possession of more than one Director Identification Number constitutes a violation of Section 155 of the Compan...
Company Law : The ROC Kolkata held that possessing more than one Director Identification Number violates Section 155 of the Companies Act, attra...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty under Section 159 after a director was found holding two DINs simultaneously in violation of Section ...
Company Law : The ROC Mumbai penalized an individual for possessing two Director Identification Numbers contrary to Section 155 of the Companies...
PPS Export and Import Pvt Ltd faces Rs. 9 lakh penalty for missing Director’s Identification Number in financial statements under Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013.
The Registrar of Companies penalizes Soundarambigai Benefit Fund Nidhi for failing to include Director Identification Numbers in required filings under the Companies Act.
MCA penalizes Singham Infraserv Pvt Ltd for failing to comply with Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013. Penalty imposed for missing DIN in financial statements.
Sunil Kumar Sharma fined ₹1,60,640 for violating Section 155 of Companies Act, 2013 by holding multiple DINs. Penalty details and appeal info included.
Unique Bharati Publication faces penalties totaling ₹4 lakh for failing to include Directors’ Identification Numbers in financial statements for FY 2014-16.
Learn about IBBI’s new rule for generating a unique Valuation Report Identification Number (VRIN) for valuations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The Andhra Pradesh High Court invalidates GST proceedings initiated without a Document Identification Number (DIN), aligning with CBDT Circulars. Learn more about the ruling.
MCA penalizes Harjinder Kaur Chawdhary ₹2.92 lakh for violating Section 155 of the Companies Act, 2013 by obtaining two Director Identification Numbers (DINs).
Siply Services fined for failing to comply with Section 158 of the Companies Act. Penalties applied to the company and its director for non-compliance.
Understand the penalty of Rs. 4,14,500 imposed by MCA for obtaining a second DIN in violation of Companies Act 2013. Learn the implications and legal insights.
