Company Law : MCA has revised the Director KYC framework, requiring DIR-3 KYC (Web) only once every three financial years. The changes reduce co...
Company Law : Section 158 makes quoting Director Identification Number (DIN) mandatory in statutory filings. Non-compliance can lead to substant...
Company Law : The MCA has replaced annual DIR-3 KYC filings with a once-in-three-years framework. Most DIN holders who complied in FY 2025-26 ar...
Company Law : Registrar of Companies clarified that Section 155 absolutely prohibits holding more than one DIN. Penalties were imposed even thou...
Company Law : Holding more than one DIN is treated as a continuing default under law. Even genuine mistakes attract penalties, though early corr...
Company Law : The government clarified that shell companies are not defined in company law, but inactive entities are removed through statutory ...
Company Law : Applying for a Director Identification Number (DIN) is a crucial step for individuals aspiring to become directors in Indian compa...
Company Law : DINs eligible to be de-flagged on expiry of the period of disqualification are in the process of verification. Necessary action sh...
Company Law : BJP professional cell, Mumbai has requested FM that The KYC for DIN Of Director should be once in 5 years or linked to be Aadhar e...
Company Law : MCA Removed ‘present Residential Address’ of Directors, KMP and Designated Partners (DPs) Till 18.08.2020, With the he...
Goods and Services Tax : While noting the delay in filing the writ petition, the Court entertained the challenge because the assessment orders lacked a DIN...
Goods and Services Tax : The Andhra Pradesh High Court held that a GST assessment order without a DIN number is invalid and non-est. The matter was remande...
Goods and Services Tax : The High Court upheld the GST assessment order, ruling that delay in filing the writ and presence of an auto-generated reference n...
Income Tax : The court examined whether assessment orders could survive when DRP directions lacked a DIN. It held that such directions were inv...
Corporate Law : The Court examined whether a sanction lacking a DIN could sustain income-tax proceedings. It held such sanction invalid and set as...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Pune held that possession of more than one Director Identification Number constitutes a violation of Section 155 of the Compan...
Company Law : The ROC Kolkata held that possessing more than one Director Identification Number violates Section 155 of the Companies Act, attra...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty under Section 159 after a director was found holding two DINs simultaneously in violation of Section ...
Company Law : The ROC Mumbai penalized an individual for possessing two Director Identification Numbers contrary to Section 155 of the Companies...
MCA penalizes CMB India Nidhi Limited’s directors for not mentioning DIN on financial statements, violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Learn about the Director Identification Number (DIN) and DIR-3 KYC process, including application, documents required, fee payment, and annual updates.
Wind World (India) Limited fined Rs. 1 Lakh by MCA for failing to include DIN in reply. Learn about the adjudication process and implications.
Understand implications of MCA’s penalty for DIN deactivation due to non-filing of DIR-3 KYC. Learn about violation, rules, penalties, and appeals process.
Discover MCA’s penalty for non-mentioning of DIN in financial statements by directors. Learn about the violation, rules, penalties, and appeal process.
Delhi ITAT rules against assessment order and notice of demand without Document Identification Number (DIN), emphasizing adherence to CBDT Circular No.19/2019.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision in Bawa Float Glass Ltd Vs DCIT regarding the absence of DIN in statutory approval under section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
M/s. Octacle Integration Private Limited director failed to comply with Companies Act by not obtaining DIN. Adjudicating Officer imposed a penalty of ₹3,65,500.
Subhangi Industries Private Limited director appointed without a DIN (Director Identification Number) faces a penalty of ₹3.41 lakh. The company failed to comply with Section 152(3) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Ashapuram Nidhi Ltd and its directors penalized for not mentioning DIN in the 2018 financial report. Total penalty of ₹2 lakh imposed by ROC West Bengal.
