Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
The company and directors were penalized under Sections 42(8), 450 & 454 of the Companies Act for incomplete securities allotment records, highlighting personal liability and the need for timely statutory filings.
ROC Goa levied maximum penalties totaling ₹4,00,000 on Indu Packaging (Daman) Limited and its three directors for repeatedly failing to print the CIN on company documents.
ROC Goa imposed an ₹8 lakh penalty on INDU PACKAGING (DAMAN) LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 197 by paying excess managerial remuneration in FY 2018-19.
ROC Goa imposed penalties on a company and its directors for failing to file Financial Statements for FY 2023-24. The ruling reinforces directors’ personal liability under Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the importance of timely compliance.
ROC Goa imposed penalties on a company and its directors for failing to file Annual Returns for FY 2022-23. The ruling highlights the statutory obligation under Section 92(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 and financial consequences for non-compliance.
ROC Kanpur penalized All Time Activation Software and its two directors ₹4,00,000/- for violating Section 134 by failing to file the Director’s Report for FY 2020.
ROC Kanpur issued an adjudication order imposing a ₹3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PVT. LTD. and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(f) and 450.
ROC Cuttack imposes a 2,00,000 penalty on DP Financial Corporation of India Limited and its director for failing to maintain a registered office under the Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Cuttack imposed penalties under Section 117(2) for failure to file a board resolution approving loans from a promoter. The order reiterates that all borrowing resolutions must be promptly filed with the Registrar.
ROC Kanpur levied a Rs 3,50,000 penalty on EAST ALPHA ALLIANCE TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED and its directors for violating Section 92(1)(g) by misreporting director remuneration in the MGT-7 annual return.
