Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...
Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...
Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...
Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...
Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...
Emperium Constructions Pvt Ltd fined Rs. 50,000 for delayed INC-20A filing. Directors penalized Rs. 19,000 each under Section 10A of Companies Act, 2013.
APS Micro Credit fined Rs. 1 lakh for violating Section 158 of the Companies Act, 2013. Director failed to mention DIN in financial statements for FY 2013-15.
The ROC, Punjab & Chandigarh, imposed penalties on Arisebhavishya India Mutual Benefit Nidhi Ltd for failing to maintain a registered office per Companies Act, 2013.
Arles Maxent Associates LLP and its designated partners fined ₹1.5 lakh by Chennai ROC for violating Section 13 of the LLP Act, 2008, due to failure to maintain a registered office.
Regional Director modifies CSR penalty for Clairvoyant India, waiving fines for directors, and reducing company penalty due to procedural errors.
River Mobility Pvt. Ltd. appealed against a ₹3L penalty for delayed share certificate issuance. ITAT reduced it to ₹1L. Read the full case summary.
Infracx Developers Pvt Ltd penalized for delayed INC-20A filing under Section 10A of the Companies Act, 2013. Total penalty: ₹43,000.
Vishnupriya Hotels’ appeal led to a penalty reduction for non-compliance with Section 149(3) of the Companies Act. The company paid Rs. 60,000 after adjudication.
Konoria Plaschem faced penalties for failing to appoint an internal auditor from 2014-2020. The fine was reduced on appeal. Read the case details.
Water & Sanitation (India) for Urban Poor failed to hold board meetings from 2011-2019, leading to penalties. The fine was later reduced on appeal.
