Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...
Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...
Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...
Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...
Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...
Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...
Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...
Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a director after Form AOC-4 contained an incorrect AGM due date. The order emphasizes that directors are resp...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai imposed a penalty after finding that an individual held two Director Identification Numbers in violation of Section 155...
Company Law : ROC Mumbai penalized a Whole Time Director for filing Form DIR-12 with an incorrect CFO appointment date. The order reiterates tha...
Company Law : The adjudicating authority held that an unlisted public company violated Section 29 by continuing to issue and transfer shares in ...
Company Law : The order emphasizes that delayed filing may regularize compliance but does not extinguish the offence committed during the period...
ROC Chandigarh penalised TSC India Limited and its directors for failing to prepare and approve consolidated financial statements under Section 134(8) of Companies Act, 2013.
ROC Goa imposes a 3.5 lakh penalty on SHREEPATI BUILD INFRA INVESTMENT and its CFO for violating Section 134(3)(h) by failing to file Form AOC-2 with the Board’s Report, omitting mandatory related party transaction disclosures for FY 2021-22.
ROC Cuttack imposes 6.5 lakh penalty on MAGNUM ESTATES LIMITED and its three directors for violating Section 77 of the Companies Act by failing to file Form CHG-1 for the modification of a secured vehicle loan charge in FY 2018-19.
ROC Cuttack imposed a ₹10 lakh penalty on Magnum Sea Foods and five directors for exceeding the limits on managerial remuneration in FY 2022-23, violating Section 197 of the Companies Act, 2013.
Magnum Sea Foods and four directors fined Rs. 7 lakh by ROC Cuttack for failing to file Form CHG-1 after securing new vehicle loans, violating the Companies Act.
ROC Bangalore imposed a 15.5 lakh penalty on PACE DIGITEK LIMITED and its director for failing to spend and timely transfer unspent Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds for FY 2020-21, violating Section 135(7).
ROC Bangalore issued a penalty order against four directors of SHASHWATHA NIDHI LIMITED for violating Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013, relating to inadequate allottee details in a 2017 filing.
ROC Bangalore issued an adjudication order against REWARD360 Global Services Pvt. Ltd. for violating Section 134 of the Companies Act, 2013, regarding incomplete Board Report disclosures for FY 2018-21.
ROC Bangalore adjudicates penalty against four directors of SHASHWATHA NIDHI LIMITED for violating Section 42(8) of the Companies Act by failing to provide complete allottee details (PAN, email, consideration particulars) in Form PAS-3 filed in 2017.
The company and its directors were penalized for not filing Form CHG-1 to register secured vehicle loans as required under Section 77 of the Companies Act, 2013. The adjudicating officer held that non-filing attracts penalties on both the company and officers in default.
