Follow Us:

Company Law Penalty

Latest Articles


Penalty for Delay in Filing of Form MSME-1

Company Law : The submission of MSME-1 is not only a requirement of the Companies Act, but it also has implications on the Income Tax Act and af...

May 3, 2024 22119 Views 0 comment Print

Failure to file MSME Form-1 resulted in a penalty of Rs. 16,09,000/-

Company Law : Learn the consequences of not filing MSME Form 1 on time as illustrated by a recent penalty case. Understand the legal requirement...

April 26, 2024 4068 Views 0 comment Print

Conundrum over Section 42(7) (Private Placement) of Companies Act 2013

Company Law : Delve into the conundrum surrounding Section 42(7) of the Companies Act 2013 as the ROC Delhi's adjudication order highlights the ...

April 4, 2024 4464 Views 2 comments Print

India Goes Global: Decoding Leap Rules & Listing Opportunities Abroad

Company Law : Explore the game-changing Companies (Listing of Equity Shares in Permissible Jurisdictions) Rules, 2024, paving the way for Indian...

January 29, 2024 2424 Views 0 comment Print

CSR Non-Compliance: Penalty Under Section 135 – AECOM India Case

Company Law : Explore penalty order under Sec. 135 of Companies Act, 2013 on AECOM India for CSR non-compliance. Learn consequences, key takeawa...

January 16, 2024 3816 Views 0 comment Print


Latest News


MCA imposes Rs 50000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC

Company Law : MCA imposes ₹50,000 penalty on Xinpoming Technology for non-filing of DIR-3 KYC under Rule 12A. Appeal can be filed within 60 da...

January 13, 2025 1161 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Judiciary


Director Limit Violation: MCA imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Penalty

Company Law : Penalty imposed on Sh. Laxit Awla under Section 165 of Companies Act, 2013, for exceeding directorship limits. Details on violatio...

November 24, 2024 1548 Views 0 comment Print

Delhi HC Denies Interim Relief on NFRA Penalties in Reliance Capital Audit

Corporate Law : Delhi High Court refuses interim relief against NFRA penalties imposed on CAs and CA firm in the Reliance Capital audit lapses cas...

May 17, 2024 5430 Views 0 comment Print


Latest Notifications


Penalty Imposed for Delay in Holding First Board Meeting Beyond Statutory Period

Company Law : The authority imposed penalties after finding the company failed to hold its first board meeting within 30 days of incorporation. ...

April 21, 2026 48 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty Imposed for Failure to Mention DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act

Company Law : The issue centered on omission of DIN details by directors in financial filings. The ruling imposed penalties while exempting indi...

April 21, 2026 51 Views 0 comment Print

Penalty Imposed for Not Mentioning DIN in Financial Statements Under Companies Act

Company Law : The ROC imposed penalties for failure to disclose DIN in financial statements, violating Section 158. The key takeaway is that non...

April 21, 2026 57 Views 0 comment Print

Missing DIN in Financial Statements Attracts Penalty Under Companies Act: ROC Kanpur

Company Law : Failure to mention DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The authority imposed penalties while limit...

April 21, 2026 87 Views 0 comment Print

DIN Not Mentioned in Financial Statements Leads to ROC Penalty

Company Law : Failure to disclose DIN in signed financial statements was held to violate Section 158. The ROC imposed penalties while limiting l...

April 21, 2026 72 Views 0 comment Print


ROC Imposes Rs. 2 Lakh Penalty for 2670-Day Delay in filing EGM resolutions

May 16, 2025 453 Views 0 comment Print

The Registrar of Companies (ROC) has imposed penalties on Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited for a significant delay in filing a company resolution, a violation of Section 117(2) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Gameskraft Technologies Faces MCA Penalty for 886-Day Delay in EGM Filing

May 16, 2025 507 Views 0 comment Print

Details of the penalty imposed by the ROC Bangalore on Gameskraft Technologies and its officers for a delay in filing a resolution under the Companies Act, 2013.

Company Issued Physical Shares Instead of Mandatory Demat – MCA Imposes Penalty

May 13, 2025 7884 Views 0 comment Print

Neptune Petrochemicals penalized ₹1.19 lakh for issuing shares in physical form in violation of Section 29 of the Companies Act for 109 days.

Non disclosure of contracts or arrangements with related parties: MCA Imposes Penalty

May 6, 2025 1197 Views 0 comment Print

ROC Hyderabad imposes penalty on BI Mining Private Limited and directors for non-disclosure of related party transactions in Board’s Report under Companies Act, 2013.

Failure to disclose investments in associate company: MCA Imposes Penalty

May 6, 2025 735 Views 0 comment Print

Registrar of Companies penalizes BI Mining for violating Companies Act Section 134(3)(g) by failing to disclose investments. Details on penalty and appeal.

Non-Disclosure of Related Party Deals: MCA Imposes ₹18 Lakh Penalty

May 6, 2025 9231 Views 0 comment Print

Hyderabad ROC penalizes BGR Mining & Infra Limited and its officers for violating Section 134(3)(h) of the Companies Act concerning related party transaction disclosures in FY 2016-19.

Non-Disclosure of Nomination & Remuneration Committee: MCA Imposes ₹18 Lakh Penalty

May 6, 2025 4545 Views 0 comment Print

BGR Mining & Infra Ltd. penalized for violations of Sections 134(3)(e) & 178(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. Penalties total Rs. 18 lakh for FY 2016-19.

Penalty of ₹2,64,500 for Duplicate DIN imposed by RoC Kolkata

April 22, 2025 3651 Views 0 comment Print

RoC Kolkata penalizes Sanjay Basu for violating Companies Act Section 155 by holding two DINs. Penalty of ₹2.64 Lakh imposed

MCA imposes penalty for delay in filing SBO declaration (BEN-1)

April 21, 2025 2778 Views 0 comment Print

Hankook Latex Pvt Ltd penalized for delay in filing SBO disclosures under Section 90 of Companies Act, 2013. MCA imposes fines on key directors.

MCA RD Rejects appeal against Penalty due to pending Supreme Court case

April 16, 2025 570 Views 0 comment Print

Regional Director rejects M. Harish Babu’s appeal against penalty for Preethi Villas Pvt Ltd audit non-compliance due to pending Supreme Court case.

Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930