Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid because the Assessing Officer reopened the case for fictit...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : The ITAT Surat held that abnormal price rise in a penny stock and surrounding circumstances justified treating claimed LTCG as une...
Income Tax : The courts upheld LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) after finding that the Revenue failed to produce evidence linking the assess...
Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...
Bombay High Court affirms ITAT’s deletion of LTCG addition on penny stock in PCIT Vs Ziauddin A Siddique case. Detailed analysis of the judgment provided.
Read about the ITAT Ahmedabad ruling in Bharatkumar Gangaram Patel vs. ITO case, where the addition for unexplained LTCG on shares was deleted due to failure to establish bogus sale.
Delve into the detailed analysis of the ITAT Mumbai ruling in ACIT Vs Priyanka Ankit Miglani case regarding long-term capital gains from share sales and the application of Section 10(38) of the Income Tax Act.
Delhi ITAT’s landmark ruling in Sarika Bindal vs. ITO establishes that capital gains from share sales cannot be deemed sham, safeguarding taxpayer rights.
Kolkata ITAT upholds LTCG disallowance in Brajesh Narnolia Vs ITO, emphasizing that a company’s genuineness isn’t judged by the magnitude of profit.
Gujarat High Court rules in favor of taxpayer in PCIT-1 vs Parasben Kochar, dismissing appeal on LTCG tax exemption under Section 10(38).
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal upholds denial of LTCG exemption on shares of Kappac Pharma Limited. Read the full analysis of this remarkable decision & its implications on taxpayers.
Investigate the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ruling in ITO vs. Indravadan Jain HUF & its implications for similar cases in the future. Assessing officer’s declarations on SEBI Investigation & LTCG of the assessee addressed.
Taxpayers and professionals alike can learn from Ayushi Jain vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO): LTCG can’t be deemed bogus without substantiated allegations. Understand the intricate details of the ruling from ITAT in Kolkata.
Ahmedabad ITAT dismisses appeal, denying LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) for bogus scrips. Read the full text of the order.
