Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that genuine sale proceeds supported by books, bank records and purchaser details cannot be treated as unexplained cash...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an Investigation Wing report alone cannot justify an addition under Section 68 without independent verific...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be sustained because the assessee produced complete documentary evi...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer failed to produce any material establishing a connection between the assessee and the all...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT sustained the addition arising from the sale of listed shares after finding discrepancies in purchase records, incl...
ITAT Mumbai upholds long-term capital gains legitimacy in Bhavna Lalit Jain’s appeal, reversing earlier AO additions and clarifying tax treatment.
ITAT Ahmedabad restores the case involving LTCG from penny stocks to CIT(A) for a fresh evaluation, emphasizing principles of natural justice and due process.
ITAT Mumbai rules that shares bought off-market and later sold on stock exchanges with proof of genuine transactions cannot be treated as unexplained income.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Calcutta decision in CIT vs. Lakshmangarh Estate & Trading Co Ltd regarding disallowance of capital losses on share transactions.
Explore the Calcutta High Court judgment in PCIT Vs Kaushalya Dealers Pvt Ltd under Income Tax Act 1961, focusing on Section 263 jurisdictional issues and assessment validity.
ITAT Jaipur rules that AO’s non-addition of bogus LTCG does not make the order automatically erroneous. Detailed analysis of Vipul Kumar Modi vs PCIT case.
Rajasthan HC dismisses Income Tax Dept’s appeal, upholds ITAT decision deleting additions on capital gain from share sale. Read the full judgment here.
MP High Court dismisses the Income Tax Dept’s appeal against Gopal Tayal, upholding ITAT’s decision on alleged bogus penny stock LTCG claim. Read full judgment.
Dive into the detailed analysis of the Calcutta High Court judgment in PCIT Vs Bina Gupta, addressing substantial questions of law regarding income tax implications on Long Term Capital Gain from penny stock sales.
ITAT Chennai upholds addition on LTCG arising from purchase and sale of shares due to failure to produce documents. Read the full analysis of the case.
