Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid because the Assessing Officer reopened the case for fictit...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : The ITAT Surat held that abnormal price rise in a penny stock and surrounding circumstances justified treating claimed LTCG as une...
Income Tax : The courts upheld LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) after finding that the Revenue failed to produce evidence linking the assess...
Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...
Punjab & Haryana HC dismisses Balbir Chand Maini’s appeal, upholding ITAT’s finding of a non-genuine share sale transaction and income addition.
Punjab & Haryana HC affirms ITAT order, treating Chandan Gupta’s share sale gain as unexplained income (Sec 68) due to bogus transactions.
ITAT Mumbai upholds treating Ratnakar Pujari’s share sale proceeds as unexplained cash credit due to a previously established bogus share purchase.
ITAT Mumbai quashed PCIT’s revision order u/s 263, finding the AO had already inquired into the LTCG exemption claim based on provided evidence.
ITAT Mumbai allowed Farrah Marker’s appeal, deleting the Section 68 addition on share sale, questioning the AO’s reliance on presumptions about penny stocks.
Mumbai ITAT dismisses tax additions on share sale gains and purchase cost, citing assessee’s documentation and accepted source in prior assessment.
Kolkata ITAT rules documented share transactions through BSE and registered broker cannot be taxed as bogus based on suspicion; upholds assessee’s evidence.
Kolkata ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, upholds CITA order favoring Shaleen Khemani on gifted share sale proceeds, citing lack of evidence.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Gautam Kumar Pincha, setting aside addition of share sale proceeds as undisclosed income due to lack of evidence.
ITAT Kolkata rules on Gaurav Pincha’s LTCG claim, deleting additions made under Section 10(38), citing lack of specific evidence and generalised suspicion.