Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that genuine sale proceeds supported by books, bank records and purchaser details cannot be treated as unexplained cash...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an Investigation Wing report alone cannot justify an addition under Section 68 without independent verific...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be sustained because the assessee produced complete documentary evi...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer failed to produce any material establishing a connection between the assessee and the all...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT sustained the addition arising from the sale of listed shares after finding discrepancies in purchase records, incl...
Kolkata ITAT dismisses revenue’s appeal, upholds CITA order favoring Shaleen Khemani on gifted share sale proceeds, citing lack of evidence.
Kolkata ITAT rules in favor of Gautam Kumar Pincha, setting aside addition of share sale proceeds as undisclosed income due to lack of evidence.
ITAT Kolkata rules on Gaurav Pincha’s LTCG claim, deleting additions made under Section 10(38), citing lack of specific evidence and generalised suspicion.
AO could not reject the LTCG Exemption claim based on mere surrounding circumstances or probabilities without presenting any legal evidence against him: ITAT
ITAT Jaipur accepts LTCG claim of Vivek Agarwal; rejects AO’s addition under Section 68, citing adequate evidence of share transactions and demat holdings.
ITAT Kolkata deletes addition under Section 68, accepting LTCG on share sale by Kiran Kothari as genuine, rejecting AO’s reliance on general reports.
Kolkata ITAT permits Minu Gupta’s LTCG exemption claim, citing lack of specific evidence against her despite AO’s reliance on general investigation reports.
ITAT Kolkata rules in favor of Raj Kumar Kabra’s LTCG claim, stressing the need for specific evidence over general suspicion in tax assessments.
ITAT Kolkata permits Pawan Kumar Kabra’s LTCG claim, emphasizing the need for specific evidence over general suspicion in assessment.
ITAT Kolkata deleted an addition related to bogus long-term capital gain, finding the assessee’s share transactions to be genuine and supported by sufficient evidence.
