Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : ITAT ruled that genuine sale proceeds supported by books, bank records and purchaser details cannot be treated as unexplained cash...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that an Investigation Wing report alone cannot justify an addition under Section 68 without independent verific...
Income Tax : The Tribunal held that the addition under Section 68 could not be sustained because the assessee produced complete documentary evi...
Income Tax : The ITAT held that the Assessing Officer failed to produce any material establishing a connection between the assessee and the all...
Income Tax : The Delhi ITAT sustained the addition arising from the sale of listed shares after finding discrepancies in purchase records, incl...
ITAT Delhi overturns LTCG addition for Rajeev Agarwal & Sons due to denial of cross-examination on key statements. Genuine transactions noted.
: ITAT Delhi quashes LTCG addition for Veena Gupta, citing violation of natural justice due to denial of cross-examination of key witnesses.
ITAT Delhi rules for Shoubit Goel (HUF), allowing LTCG u/s 10(38) on Unno Industries shares. Lack of specific evidence against assessee overrides AO’s doubts.
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act by treating LTCG as bogus merely on the basis of assumption and conjecture is not sustainable in law since purchase and sale of shares were made via banking channel.
ITAT Mumbai allows Sonal Shah’s appeal, quashing reassessment for AY 2012-13 based on borrowed satisfaction and deleting bogus LTCG addition under Sec 68.
ITAT Mumbai allows Sejal Jignesh Shah’s appeal against tax additions under Section 68, rejecting AO’s reliance on investigation reports in a penny stock case.
Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price manipulation. The Income tax Act, 1961, contains provisions such as Section 68 (Unexplained Cash Credits) and Section 10(38) (Exemption on Long Term Capital Gains LTCG) to prevent tax evasion through sham transactions involving these stocks.
ITAT Delhi overturns tax addition in Puja Gupta Vs ITO, ruling that share transactions were genuine. Revenue’s reliance on suspicion and probabilities dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ramesh Rikhavdas Shah, rejecting AO’s additions on alleged penny stock transactions and commission expenses for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16.
ITAT Mumbai rules that share transactions backed by DEMAT statements cannot be treated as bogus income without concrete proof.
