Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Arihant Suresh Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs Arihant Suresh Jain (ITAT Mumbai)

No addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, merely for trading in penny stock, when the assessee submits necessary details and the AO fails to bring anything contrary on record.

Facts of the case: The assessee’s case was reopened based on the information received from the investigation wing, alleging that the assessee was a beneficiary of bogus Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) /Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) through trading in scrips of VMS Industries and Scan Steels Limited. During the reassessment proceedin

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio


My Published Posts

Full TDS Credit Allowed to Husband for Jointly Owned Property Section 271D & 271E Penalty cannot be levied if assessment is quashed No section 68 addition in the hands of conduit entity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
April 2025
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930