Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Arihant Suresh Jain (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Arihant Suresh Jain (ITAT Mumbai) No addition u/s. 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, merely for trading in penny stock, when the assessee submits necessary details and the AO fails to bring anything contrary on record. Facts of the case: The assessee’s case was reopened based on the information received from the investigation wing, alleging that the assessee was a beneficiary of bogus Long Term Capital Gain (LTCG) /Short Term Capital Loss (STCL) through trading in scrips of VMS Industries and Scan Steels Limited. During the reassessment proceedings, the assessee did not make any re...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio


My Published Posts

Full TDS Credit Allowed to Husband for Jointly Owned Property Section 271D & 271E Penalty cannot be levied if assessment is quashed No section 68 addition in the hands of conduit entity View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930