Income Tax : ITAT Ahmedabad confirms Section 68 addition of ₹93.92 lakh for bogus LTCG from Kushal Tradelink shares, rejecting the appeal bas...
Income Tax : Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price...
Income Tax : Introduction: The assessee has been taking a common argument against the addition on account of penny stock. The said argument rev...
Income Tax : The provision for exemption of long term capital gains from shares requiring payment of securities transaction tax has been taken ...
Income Tax : It is a very well-known fact that High court only entertains question of law and Income tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) is the last ...
Income Tax : The ITAT Ahmedabad held that reassessment under Section 147 was invalid because the Assessing Officer reopened the case for fictit...
Income Tax : The Tribunal ruled that a genuine share transaction resulting in a short-term loss cannot automatically be treated as a make-belie...
Income Tax : The ITAT Surat held that abnormal price rise in a penny stock and surrounding circumstances justified treating claimed LTCG as une...
Income Tax : The courts upheld LTCG exemption under Section 10(38) after finding that the Revenue failed to produce evidence linking the assess...
Income Tax : The High Court ruled that reopening under Sections 147 and 148 was unsustainable because the Assessing Officer’s reasons amounte...
ITAT Delhi held that addition under section 68 of the Income Tax Act by treating LTCG as bogus merely on the basis of assumption and conjecture is not sustainable in law since purchase and sale of shares were made via banking channel.
ITAT Mumbai allows Sonal Shah’s appeal, quashing reassessment for AY 2012-13 based on borrowed satisfaction and deleting bogus LTCG addition under Sec 68.
ITAT Mumbai allows Sejal Jignesh Shah’s appeal against tax additions under Section 68, rejecting AO’s reliance on investigation reports in a penny stock case.
Penny stocks, often associated with small, illiquid companies, have been a subject of concern due to their susceptibility to price manipulation. The Income tax Act, 1961, contains provisions such as Section 68 (Unexplained Cash Credits) and Section 10(38) (Exemption on Long Term Capital Gains LTCG) to prevent tax evasion through sham transactions involving these stocks.
ITAT Delhi overturns tax addition in Puja Gupta Vs ITO, ruling that share transactions were genuine. Revenue’s reliance on suspicion and probabilities dismissed.
ITAT Mumbai rules in favor of Ramesh Rikhavdas Shah, rejecting AO’s additions on alleged penny stock transactions and commission expenses for AYs 2014-15, 2015-16.
ITAT Mumbai rules that share transactions backed by DEMAT statements cannot be treated as bogus income without concrete proof.
ITAT Delhi held that Long Term Capital Gain [LTCG] earned from transaction in penny stock is liable for addition. Accordingly, appeal of assessee dismissed and order of CIT(A) being well reasoned is upheld.
ITAT Kolkata invalidates reassessment in Pradip Kumar Jajodia HUF case, citing lack of tangible evidence for alleged bogus LTCG on penny stock transactions.
ITAT deletes addition of Rs. 48.48 lakh for penny stock investment, ruling that no concrete evidence was presented by the Income Tax authorities.
