Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Antara Tushar Motiwala (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Antara Tushar Motiwala (ITAT Mumbai) Section 68 Cannot Be Invoked in Partner’s Hands for Firm’s Loan Write-Back: ITAT Mumbai Upholds Deletion of ₹8.38 Crore Addition The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT dismissed the Revenue’s appeal for AY 2017-18 and upheld the order of the CIT(A) deleting the addition of ₹8.38 crore made under section 68 read with section 115BBE in the hands of an individual partner. The addition arose from an increase in the assessee’s capital account consequent to the write-back of an old unsecured loan in the books of the partnership firm, M/s Lotus Investment...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031