Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Surajpal Singh Rathod Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Surajpal Singh Rathod Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Cash Found During Search Belonging to Company Cannot Be Taxed in Director’s Hands: ITAT Mumbai Deletes Section 69A Addition The Mumbai Bench of the ITAT allowed the assessee’s appeal for AY 2021-22 and deleted the addition of ₹3.50 lakh made under section 69A as unexplained money in the hands of an individual director. The addition arose from a search under section 132 conducted on the Rubberwala Group, during which a courier was intercepted at the business premises of RD Telinet Pvt. Ltd., carrying cash of ₹3.50 lakh allegedly meant to be ha...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

WhatsApp Chats & Third-Party Tally Data Alone Can’t Create Tax Liability: ITAT Mumbai Excel Sheets & Third-Party Statements Alone Cannot Prove Cash Payment: ITAT Mumbai Demonetisation Sales Cannot Be Treated as Bogus for Accepting SBNs: ITAT Bangalore Form 16 Trap: ITAT Deletes ₹51 Lakh Penalty on Wrong ESOP Exemption Claim Pune ITAT Quashes Section 148 Notice for Taking Sanction From PCIT Instead of PCCIT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031