Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shalini Srivastava Vs Ward-2(1)(1) (ITAT Dehradun)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shalini Srivastava Vs Ward-2(1)(1) (ITAT Dehradun) Rule 46A Technicality Can’t Trump Justice: ITAT Dehradun Remands ₹13.32 Cr s.68 Addition Dehradun ITAT ‘DB’ Bench, in Shalini Srivastava vs. ITO (ITA No.121/DDN/2025, AY 2019-20, order dated 24.12.2025), partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes and set aside the ex-parte orders, remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer for de-novo adjudication. The assessment was completed u/s 144 r.w.s. 144B due to non-compliance, resulting in huge additions aggregating ₹13.32 crore, primarily on account of bank deposits treated as u...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031