Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Baldev Prasad Patel (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Baldev Prasad Patel (ITAT Raipur) CIT(A) Deleted ₹15.81 Cr Addition Based on Fresh Evidence Without Remand Report—Matter Remanded Back for Rule 46A Violation Revenue challenged the NFAC order dated 07.08.2025 whereby the CIT(A)/NFAC deleted an addition of Rs.15,81,34,560/- made u/s 69A. Assessee had neither filed a return nor responded to notices u/s 148 & 142(1), due to which the AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B based on huge cash deposits in a Punjab National Bank account. CIT(A)/NFAC accepted fresh evidences-including communications from PNB & detail...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031