This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Restores ₹15 Crore Cash Addition: CIT(A) Failed to Seek Remand Report & Violated Rule 46A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Baldev Prasad Patel (ITAT Raipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2019-20
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Raipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Baldev Prasad Patel (ITAT Raipur)
CIT(A) Deleted ₹15.81 Cr Addition Based on Fresh Evidence Without Remand Report—Matter Remanded Back for Rule 46A Violation
Revenue challenged the NFAC order dated 07.08.2025 whereby the CIT(A)/NFAC deleted an addition of Rs.15,81,34,560/- made u/s 69A. Assessee had neither filed a return nor responded to notices u/s 148 & 142(1), due to which the AO completed reassessment u/s 147 r.w.s 144 r.w.s 144B based on huge cash deposits in a Punjab National Bank account.
CIT(A)/NFAC accepted fresh evidences-including communications from...
Author Info
