Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Rajesh Kumar Kedia (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

DCIT Vs Rajesh Kumar Kedia (ITAT Kolkata)

Dumb Documents & Probable Transactions Can’t Justify Reopening – ITAT Kolkata Quashes 69A Addition & Reassessment Based on Search

Assessee was alleged to have advanced unaccounted cash loans of ₹8.80 crore through finance brokers Sanwaria & Kasera, based on documents seized during a search on their group. AO reopened the assessment u/s 147 & added ₹9.41 crore u/s 69A (including interest & brokerage) treating the seized papers as proof of unaccounted investments. AO also relied on brokers’ statements reco

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Deemed Addition U/s 56(2)(vii)(b) – ITAT Chennai ITAT Chennai: 60% Tax U/s 115BBE Not Applicable for AY 2017-18 Transactions Prior to 01-04-2017 View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031