Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ardent Steels Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Raipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Page ContentsArdent Steels Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Raipur) Ardent Steels Private Limited Vs PCIT (ITAT Raipur) ITAT Quashes 263 Order as PCIT Withheld Adverse Material & Ignored Evidence of Genuine Purchases Assessment for A.Y. 2020-21 was completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144B making only a minor disallowance of cess. PCIT later invoked revision u/s 263 alleging that Assessee’s purchases of ₹3.94 crore from M/s B B Medicare Pvt. Ltd. were bogus, treating the supplier as a “shell company” based on a SEBI list & assuming its iron ore trading licence was suspended. PCIT held AO f...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930