Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjit Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Amarjit Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)

Penalty u/s 271D Remanded: Ex-parte Confirmation by CIT(A) Cannot Deny Substantive Justice

Assessee challenged penalty orders passed u/s 271D for AYs 2018-19 & 2019-20, which were confirmed by CIT(A) ex-parte due to non-appearance & non-filing of submissions. Before ITAT also, none appeared for Assessee, while Revenue supported lower authorities.

ITAT held that although Ass

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Income Tax Appeals Dismissed Due to NCLT Moratorium Against Personal Guarantors Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels Accepted; Section 68 Addition of ₹2.87 Cr Deleted On-Money Addition for Flat Purchase Deleted; Builder’s General Statement Alone Not Enough Bogus Purchase Cases: Only Profit Element Taxable; 4% GP Addition Upheld on ₹5.79 Cr Purchases Recorded Sales Cannot Be Taxed Again u/s 68; Additions Based Only on Third-Party Statement Deleted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031