Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amarjit Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2019-20
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amarjit Mehta Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Penalty u/s 271D Remanded: Ex-parte Confirmation by CIT(A) Cannot Deny Substantive Justice Assessee challenged penalty orders passed u/s 271D for AYs 2018-19 & 2019-20, which were confirmed by CIT(A) ex-parte due to non-appearance & non-filing of submissions. Before ITAT also, none appeared for Assessee, while Revenue supported lower authorities. ITAT held that although Assessee failed to file submissions before CIT(A), mere non-prosecution cannot result in denial of substantive justice, particularly in penalty matters. Tribunal observed that CIT(A) h...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031