Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Landmark Exim Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Landmark Exim Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Speaking Order Missing- Mechanical Dismissal by CIT(A) Fails: ITAT Remands 43B Disallowance for Fresh Adjudication Delhi ITAT ‘E’ Bench in Landmark Exim Pvt Ltd vs DCIT, Central Circle-5, Delhi (ITA No.5910/Del/2025, AY 2020-21, order dated 23-12-2025) set aside the order of CIT(A) insofar as it related to disallowance of ₹7.66 lakh u/s 43B, and restored the matter for fresh adjudication. Assessee had inadvertently made a suo motu disallowance u/s 43B in respect of TDS payable, though such disallowance was not warranted under law. Durin...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031