Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brahmayya Vs DCIT (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brahmayya Vs DCIT (Madras High Court) The Madras High Court examined whether LIC premium payments made by the assessee to ապահով a monthly annuity of ₹15,000 for employees (including partners) upon retirement constituted an allowable business deduction or a contingent liability. The Tribunal had disallowed the deduction, treating the payments as unrelated to services and linked to goodwill. However, the Court held that the premium payments were made to fulfill an existing contractual obligation and not a contingent liability. It observed that failure to pay premiums would defeat the as...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 153C Notices Quashed as Satisfaction Note Was Recorded Nearly 10 Months Late Bombay HC Dismissed Revenue Appeal as It Did Not Challenge CIT(A)’s Order Employer Not Liable to Refund TDS Due to Non-Filing of Form 10E: Madras HC Foreign Tax Credit Cannot Be Denied Solely Due to Belated Form 67: ITAT Kolkata Delay in Filing Form 10B Condoned as Covid-19 Caused Genuine Hardship: Orissa HC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031