This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Quashes Section 270A Penalty as AO Failed to Specify Exact Clause
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Divya Burman Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Divya Burman Vs Assessment Unit (ITAT Delhi)
Penalty under section 270A is unsustainable if the Assessing Officer fails to specify the exact statutory clause of section 270A(2) invoked for under-reporting or misreporting of income, either in the penalty notice or in the penalty order.
The ITAT Delhi in Divya Burman Vs Assessment Unit held that penalty proceedings under Section 270A of the Income Tax Act are invalid if the Assessing Officer fails to specify the exact statutory clause of Section 270A(2) invoked for under-reporting or misreporting of income. The assessee had disc...






