Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Gowramma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Gowramma Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Summary: In Gowramma vs ITO, ITAT Bangalore addressed the addition of ₹10,00,000 to the assessee’s income under section 69A for unexplained cash deposits during the demonetisation period in A.Y. 2017-18. The assessee, a small trader over 70 years of age, explained that the deposits consisted of ₹9,00,000 received as a gift from his son, ₹65,000 from savings in his vegetable business, and ₹35,000 from the sale of old gold, supported by bank statements and transaction details submitted under Rule 46A. The Assessing Officer and CIT(A) had ignored this ev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031