Case Law Details
Case Name : Lalitha Padmaja Thallapalli Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Hyderabad
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Lalitha Padmaja Thallapalli Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
ITAT Hyderabad held that trade advance given to goldsmith for making gold jewellery and excess amount paid has been received back in cash. The same cannot be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained cash credit. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 is directed to be deleted.
Facts- The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business of retail trade in gold, jewellery, and silver articles, under the name and style of M/s. Shri Aabharanalu. AO completed the assessment by making various additio
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

