Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Lalitha Padmaja Thallapalli Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Lalitha Padmaja Thallapalli Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that trade advance given to goldsmith for making gold jewellery and excess amount paid has been received back in cash. The same cannot be added under section 68 of the Income Tax Act as unexplained cash credit. Accordingly, addition u/s. 68 is directed to be deleted.

Facts- The assessee is an individual, engaged in the business of retail trade in gold, jewellery, and silver articles, under the name and style of M/s. Shri Aabharanalu. AO completed the assessment by making various additio

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
January 2026
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031