Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pinkal Dilip Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pinkal Dilip Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Diamond Purchases Fully Disallowed: ITAT Mumbai Upholds 100% Addition u/s 69C Based on Jain–Choudhary Accommodation Entry Racket ITAT Mumbai (C Bench) in Pinkal Dilip Bhansali vs ITO (ITA No. 1701/Mum/2025, AY 2011-12, order dated 23.12.2025) has dismissed the assessee’s appeal, upholding reopening u/s 148 and 100% disallowance of ₹2.24 crore u/s 69C towards alleged bogus diamond purchases from M/s Nazar Impex Pvt. Ltd., an entity found to be part of the Rajendra Jain / Sanjay Choudhary accommodation-entry group. The reassessment was initi...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031