Case Law Details
Case Name : Nirman Sonestaa Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Nirman Sonestaa Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Compounding Fee for Plan Deviations Not Allowable – ITAT Bangalore Upholds Disallowance Under Explanation 1 to 37(1)
Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in construction of flats, paid Rs.76,05,613/- as compounding fee to BBMP for regularising deviations from the sanctioned building plan. AO held the payment to be penal in nature, being compounding of an offence under municipal law, & disallowed it by invoking Explanation 1 to s.37(1). CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.
Before Tribunal, no one appeared for Assessee. Tribunal examined th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.


