Case Law Details
Case Name : Nirman Sonestaa Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Nirman Sonestaa Developers Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Compounding Fee for Plan Deviations Not Allowable – ITAT Bangalore Upholds Disallowance Under Explanation 1 to 37(1)
Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in construction of flats, paid Rs.76,05,613/- as compounding fee to BBMP for regularising deviations from the sanctioned building plan. AO held the payment to be penal in nature, being compounding of an offence under municipal law, & disallowed it by invoking Explanation 1 to s.37(1). CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance.
Before Tribunal, no one appeared for Assessee. Tribunal examined th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

