Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Fees Regulating Authority Vs ACIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Fees Regulating Authority Vs ACIT (Exemption) (ITAT Mumbai) CBDT Delay Can’t Defeat Exemption Claim: ITAT Revives Section 10(46) Relief for Maharashtra Fee Regulator The Mumbai ITAT granted major relief to the Fees Regulating Authority, Maharashtra, by restoring the issue of taxability back to the AO after noting that its application for exemption under Section 10(46) has been pending before the CBDT for years. The Authority, constituted under the Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutions Act, 2015, had claimed exemption under Section 10(46) as a statutory body create...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

CSR Disallowance Under Section 37 Does Not Bar Relief Under Section 80G- Bangalore ITAT Bangalore ITAT Deletes ₹99.24 Lakh Ad Hoc Disallowance Backed by Evidence Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930