Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amit Katyal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Amit Katyal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) No Addition Under Section 69A Without Independent Inquiry Into Alleged Cash Transactions;  ITAT Quashes Cash Payment Addition as Revenue Relied Only on Presumptions and Digital Messages;  Wedding Expense Addition Deleted as Revenue Failed to Prove Assessee Paid Cash Amounts;  ITAT Rules Third-Party Search Documents Cannot Automatically Justify Addition Against Assessee. Summary: In Amit Katyal Vs DCIT, the Delhi ITAT deleted additions made under Section 69A relating to alleged cash payments to a sportsperson and wedding-related expenses, holding that the add...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Ajay Kumar Agrawal FCA, a science graduate and fellow chartered accountant in practice for over 26 years. Ajay has been in continuous practice mainly in corporate consultancy, litigation in the field of Direct and Indirect laws, Regulatory Law, and commercial law beside the Auditing of corporate and View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Grants TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax with Government ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty as Estimated Addition Cannot Justify Penalty ITAT Deletes Bogus Purchase Addition as AO Failed to Disprove Documentary Evidence TDS Under Section 194J Upheld for Coaching Institute Faculty Bad Debt Deduction Allowed as Effective Write-Off Need Not Close Debtor Account View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930