Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Purvesh Mansukhlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Dr. Purvesh Mansukhlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) Conclusion: Assessee could not have been subjected to additions in case of search/survey operations merely on basis of statement recorded under section 132(4) unless and until some corroborative evidence was found in support of such admission. Held: Assessee was subjected to a survey under Section 133A where he disclosed ₹14 crores as undisclosed income for the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. He admitted to earning this income through unaccounted cash from land dealings as a land broker. However, in the return filed for AY 2012-13, he declare...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031