Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Purvesh Mansukhlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Dr. Purvesh Mansukhlal Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

Conclusion: Assessee could not have been subjected to additions in case of search/survey operations merely on basis of statement recorded under section 132(4) unless and until some corroborative evidence was found in support of such admission.

Held: Assessee was subjected to a survey under Section 133A where he disclosed ₹14 crores as undisclosed income for the assessment year (AY) 2012-13. He admitted to earning this income through unaccounted cash from land dealings as a land broker. Ho

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31