Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jalaram Tararam Purohit Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) Addition u/s 69 for Alleged On-Money Deleted – Third Party Statements & Pen-Drive Data Without Cross Examination Not Valid Evidence – ITAT Mumbai AO made addition u/s 69 alleging cash “on-money” payment for shop purchase based on statements of builder group employees and excel/pen-drive data found during search in third party premises. Assessee denied any cash payment and contended that entire consideration was paid by cheque as per agreement. CIT(A) confirmed addition. ITAT held that addition cannot be sustained merely on third-party s...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Occupancy Certificate Not Starting Point for Indexation: Bangalore ITAT Allows Benefit From Actual Use Date Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition Over Lack of Inquiry & Cross-Examination 10-Year Silence & Uncancelled GPA: SC Upholds Sale Against Fraud Claims Section 271D Penalty Cannot Survive After Reassessment Itself is Quashed: Mumbai ITAT Unsigned Affidavit Can’t End Appeal: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Allow Defect Correction View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031