Supreme Court held that the discontinuation of the Appellant Workmen’s services, effected without compliance with Section 6E and Section 6N of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, is illegal. Thus, all the orders terminating the services are quashed.
Supreme Court examines “first offence” definition under Section 276CC of the Income Tax Act in the Vinubhai Mohanlal Dobaria case. Detailed analysis of the ruling.
Supreme Court confirms that Section 153C notices issued without a valid satisfaction note are invalid, aligning with the Delhi High Court’s decision in PCIT vs. Dev Technofab Ltd.
Supreme Court rejects SLP of Goverdhandham Estate against Rajasthan HC’s decision in GST dispute over ITC eligibility on elevators and ACs.
Supreme Court mandates e-filing for tax appeals in High Courts, ITAT, and CESTAT, aiming to streamline legal processes and reduce physical paperwork.
Supreme Court held that illegal termination of employment constitutes a civil dispute rather than criminal intimidation. Accordingly, appeal allowed and chargesheet against the appellants are quashed.
Respondent had already reached the age of superannuation and he worked under pressure, penalty of dismissal was disproportionate to the misconduct established against the respondent and his unblemished career for a long time.
SC judgment in Arnesh Kumar case stresses strict compliance with CrPC Sections 41 & 41A for arrests in offences punishable up to 7 years, ensuring safeguards.
SC ruled private entities performing public functions fall under High Court and SC writ jurisdiction, but private banks like Muthoot Finance aren’t public duty entities.
Supreme Court upholds CESTAT’s decision, ruling no service tax is applicable on reimbursement of expenses, as no service element exists.
